The author David Foster Wallace, best known for his novel “Infinite Jest,” “a vast investigation into America as the land of addictions: to television, to drugs, to loneliness,” committed suicide on September 12, 2008 at the age of 46. Wallace, who suffered from depression for more than twenty years, struggled for more than a decade with his unfinished third novel, “The Pale King,” which he hoped would surpass “Infinite Jest.”
In the March 9th issue of The New Yorker, D.T. Max writes about Wallace’s twin struggles:
Although “depression,” writes Max, “often figured in his work,” Wallace “never published a word about his own mental illness.”
As to the public display of grief over Wallace’s death, it was “connected to a feeling that, for all his outpouring of words, he died with his work incomplete. Wallace, at least, never felt that he had hit his target. His goal had been to show readers how to live a fulfilled, meaningful life. ‘Fiction’s about what it is to be a fucking human being,’ he once said. Good writing should help readers to ‘become less alone inside.'”
“From 1997 on, Wallace worked on a third novel, which he never finished—the ‘Long Thing,’ as he referred to it . . . His drafts, which his wife found in their garage after his death, amount to several hundred thousand words, and tell of a group of employees at an Internal Revenue Service center in Illinois, and how they deal with the tediousness of their work.” (more @ The New Yorker)
An excerpt from Wallace’s unfinished novel can be found here.
The partial manuscript will be published next year by Little, Brown.
Related: For David Foster Wallace’s survivors, a paper puzzle (via LA Times)
[In 1999, Amherst [College] magazine writer Stacey Schmeidel interviewed Wallace by mail. The feature-length Q & A, titled “Brief Interview With a Five Draft Man,” ran in the Spring 1999 issue of the magazine, and is reprinted here.]
Hello there — my blog generated a “related link” to your post, and I wanted to send along this link to my post on the DT Max article — I had a specific take on it (i.e. strong negative feelings). I found the final paragraph, and Max’s conclusions about the meaning of Wallace’s death, disappointing, and even reprehensible. To me, that brand of profile-journalism represents the worst kind of contemporary writing about artists.
http://sonyachung.com/2009/03/07/cult-of-literary-celebrit/
(post password is dfw)